PROD.7 New Information: The Hounding of the McCanns

New information was leaking from Facebook Madeleine, seeking the truth
It was published on the blog of the American Tony: The Hounding of the McCanns

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/2011/09/i-am-zee-mole-and-i-lived-in-da-hole.html

Really Bret? You want the journalists and Kate McCann dead! You Nasty Little Dweeb!

Corn syrup and Silver-Back Gorillas Hardy? Blech!

PROD.8 Victims of David Bret: Affairs Valentino + updates!

David Bret's website on ladies of Affairs Valentino
http://www.davidbret.blogspot.com/?zx=47178e46960474a3

http://affairsvalentino.blogspot.com/?zx=469b696190f61a7

Don't Believe The Lies About Evelyn Zumaya or Affairs Valentino!

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3819414/The-Sun-finds-the-troll-behind-sick-Madeleine-McCann-Facebook-page.html 


If you, dear readers, scroll down to the end of the above linked article, you will find mention of someone oft referred to in this blog. The mention appears just below the photograph of the parents of a missing child, Madeleine McCann. As I have been defending myself from David Bret’s attacks on me and my work over the past two years, I was completely unaware of his blog involvement with the case of this missing child. I remember the tragic event of her disappearance when it occurred but I have not much other knowledge of the case. About two months ago someone sent me a link to Bret’s blog about this missing child. Quite frankly I was horrified.


The first thing that hit me was the “adult disclaimer” page on Bret’s McCann blog. Why, I thought, would a blog concerning a missing child require an adult disclaimer. Then I realized why…because David Bret was writing it! After all I had been the target of his signature brand of unholy perverse comments and images…and I knew them all very well. But I am a parent and a grand parent and I was sickened to think of  how this had to be adding to this missing child’s parents profound pain. I could only imagine their grief and daily anguish not knowing the fate of their precious baby. And to have someone like David Bret “blog involved” in any capacity was an unthinkable horror.


I know what it feels like to have him attacking you…or worse…feigning to be such a god damn hero when he is in fact adding immeasurably to an already bad situation. Feigning to be the victim of his own generated hell, feigning he has contacts with Scotland Yard, feigning he is put out by any of this. He loves this…this is his manna…disorder and the pain of his victims.


My only question would be this one for David Bret: Since you write almost exclusively sexually referenced and highly depraved material, since you attack your critics with words of hate and slander and scatological reference, since you think it funny to mock my father’s death and my death, since you find it amusing and just to write about my private parts and personal hygiene, on and on…how in god’s name do you think it appropriate in any measure that you would run a blog devoted to a missing child? I find this very sick.


I think the most offensive new tactic of David Bret is to act like the victim in any of this. He is contacting Scotland Yard? For what…to tell them that he has been blatantly and publicly defaming innocent people online for years? To tell them that he willfully and without hesitation ruins the reputations of people who dare to criticize him or his work? To tell them he has posted lies upon lies online …lies that have caused and continue to cause tremendous suffering to his victims?


As I have written here before I once tried to go away and drop off of Bret’s hateful radar. It did not work. For the nearly one year I was silent he continued. He did so to keep my online presence a lesson in infamy. For this I now post and fight back. It is a question of math as I have pointed out before…exhausting math. Even last week as he pretended to critique my book he was writing heavy, sick sexual references about me….claiming I participated in a sexual act which I really had never heard of…I had to look it up. Won’t repeat it here. NO legitimate review of a book includes such matter!!


So KUDOS to the Sun reporters…they found out and I am pleased. They called his actions “immoral”. They are. And they called him a troll. I say perfect.


http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/What_is_a_troll%3F


Coincidently the moment the Sun's mention appeared, David Bret’s blog attacking me and Hala Pickford was removed. It disappeared once before for about two days…after I sent the police to his home…I venture to bet it will be back up and abusing asap… But if David Bret  is so very proud of what he writes and such an innocent victim in this horrible situation he generated and maintains…then why did he panic and hide the evidence? I think I know why...he feared I would contact the Sun and they in turn might take a look at his other blog…the one about those “Valentino women in the USA”…so he hid the goods. Well I have screenshots as I have said of every word…its not gone. And as the Google search mess about me and my book and my father is still contaminated by him…his foul blog is not forgotten. I do not have to remove my blog in the middle of the night to hide evidence as he did…I stand by every word on this blog and am proud of my defense of my reputation and my work.


 “Anonymous from London” sent me the link to the Sun piece. Thank you very much. And I am on this. Expose David Bret.


UPDATES


http://affairsvalentino.blogspot.com/2011/09/david-bret-writes-lies-about-evelyn.html
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2011

David Bret Writes Lies About Evelyn Zumaya
Today David Bret’s blog attacking me is back…and his signature lie and hate-filled post is a vicious attempt to defend himself. How desperate can he be to claim that The Sun is confusing him with someone else? And he is now denying everything thing he wrote about me. I have plenty of proof that David Bret wrote a lot about me and my father…to which he refers. He was stuck on that subject for a long time…how many times do you think you called me “Daddy Gobbles” David Bret? And all the references to me drinking "embalming fluid", the new "playmate in heaven", the "dogs in the park", "keeping it in the family"?? My god...it was extreme. And no…a thousand times no…it was never funny.

Now I can not post the actual screenshots of these posts here on this blog…which most of my readers remember anyway. For even though Bret denies publicly he said these things, when I post the photos of his blog… he screams to Google that I am violating his copyright infringement. Which is, in fact, admission he wrote it all anyway. But I do not lie. I have it all.

I have not received a phone call from The Sun and have not been interviewed by a reporter as of this posting. So he is wrong about that. But I do have a hard drive full of screenshots of his most heinous posts…which he has removed…and even those files of his other victims which they have sent me. These include the posts when he publicized my home phone number and maiden name on the world wide web…with a title saying “We’re Almost There Folks!”…that was last summer…and a post on his filthy blog of my father’s obituary only a few days after he passed away. These screenshots include all of Bret’s images of rotting corpses posted as my Dad and poems and ditties about me having sex with him and worse. No one would tolerate such abuse! He can not say this did not happen because it did.

These screenshots also include his posted pictures of me as a corpse...(he has used the same photos on his other blogs)... and written countless scenarios of my bloody death; anthrax, throat slitting, brains splattered. And oh the hundreds of times Death Bret has called me a “homophobic hag!” and then followed this with his battle cry.. “The only good homophobe is a dead one!” And then yes there was the recent blistering campaign by Bret and his hench men and woman…to convince the world I was once arrested for cocaine possession and that I suffer from dementia. All lies. Oh there is more believe me…I merely scratch the surface.

I save these screenshots as proof because Bret plays a very nasty shell game by removing posts and blogs…shuffling his sex and death libel about… here and there and then posting more lies saying he never said any of it. He pitifully suggests that all of that horrid material must have been written by someone else named David Bret.. How stupid does he think his victims are…we save all of it. Even after posts are deleted..a court can subpoena Blogger or seize a hard drive to find proof.

Please believe nothing this man writes about me…or says about me. I write the truth. I will continue to defend myself and my work which is all I have ever done..and David Bret needs to stop playing with other people's lives. His victims are real people.



http://affairsvalentino.blogspot.com/2011/09/david-brets-delirium.html

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2011

valentino.blogspot.com/2011/09/defense-of-myself-once-again-from-david.html

David Bret's Delirium

In response to Bret's total delirium of lies....of course I have nothing to do with any "Expose Hala Pickford " blogs as he claims. 


I have two blogs...this one and http://evelynzumayaisalive.blogspot.com/ .  After reading the offensive blog he mentioned, I would venture a guess that perhaps Christina Wagenti or Chris W. Agenti may be behind that one. Same language...same writing style...same total BS. 

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2011

http://affairsvalentino.blogspot.com/2011/09/defense-of-myself-once-again-from-david.html

Defense of Myself Once Again From David Bret's Attacks

Well David Bret missed the point of the picture I posted of the stairway to no where. The reference was to his continued attacks on me. And regarding his utterly failed attempt to write a little biography of me today…as with all of his biographical attempts he was wrong on every point. David Bret knows nothing about my book, my family or my personal life.  Low life that he is to write such lies about my family. Because his motive is always to make me suffer. To make me sad, nervous, angry and hurt. This is what David Bret wants. To hurt. Sadist that he is.

            I am not obsessed with Rudolph Valentino as he writes…but my god...dear god...he is. Rudolph Valentino was just the subject of a book I wrote. End of story. I finished writing my book on Valentino some time ago and have moved on to other projects. These projects do not involve Valentino or silent film. I am hard at work on them now.

     If anyone can be described as obsessed with Valentino it would be David Bret. After all these years since his tiny little book on Valentino was published…he is still harping away as if he is some fat know-it-all...but breaking news...he has yet to receive respect for it. Sales maybe but no respect. Why was he not invited to the international conference on Valentino held in Turin in February 2009 as I was? Why was he not asked to deliver a paper there as I was? Why was the name David Bret not on the program along with the other prestigious scholars as mine was? Why was he not invited to the opening night reception at the National Film Museum as I was? Hmmmm.

            First of all it is because he doesn’t know anything about Rudolph Valentino, i.e. …saying I lived on Bella Drive and calling Lou Mahoney…“Jock” Mahoney and saying Valentino had love affairs with every man he met...I think the count was about 35 men. Secondly Bret has a vile, obscene mouth. Who would want that at the lecturn?

   The more this son-of-a-bitch writes the worse he looks to everyone everywhere. The "Respect-O-Meter" ...as far as Bret is concerned... is about as rock bottom as it can go. It went kerplunk a very long time ago.

Regarding Bret's claim about some third blog... I have only two blogs…no more. I suspect that vile third blog he is talking about was created by him. He has done this in the past to try and make me look bad. He does not bat an eye doing something like that. Nevertheless…another fail on his behalf. People know I don't write things like that and that I am not under handed, obscene or thoughtless as he accuses me of being. I put a great deal of thought into every single, solitary word I write.

            Such as these words for example: dirty, seedy, cheap, mean, heartless, small-minded, vindictive, perverted, trivial, boring, tired, old, god, help, us, make, him, stop, hate, it, him, who, well, you, know, hell, fires, best, David, Bret, can, not, write, son, of, a, bitch.

Love ya’ll.

Thanks for the support…and it grows day by day…you know who I mean!!! Great!

CIAO!

By the way…my family and I are cool. No problems there.

PROD.9 Another victim of David Bret

Another victim of Mr Bret's activities, member of a French Facebook

Anastasia Beaverhausen: In the comments section of this blog: justathought


http://jatyk.blogspot.com/2011/09/well-done-my-sun-brats-previous-victims.html




Facebook: http://fr-fr.facebook.com/pages/Pour-que-Brigitte-Bl%C3%A9-se-tappe-une-extinction-de-voix-et-la-ferme-un-peu/143410349023247



Anastasia Beaverhausen How proud he must feel to be despised so much. I mean its so sad that to create publicity for the trash and lies he writes he has to say awful, personal and slanderous things about people who question and doubt what he has written about the person they see as their icon. Bret has a mental problem which you already knew. All the things he accuses people of being are what he really is and examples of his fantasies he has. Its a justification to reassure him that its ok to be they way he is so blaming someone else for being all the things he accuses them of being makes him feel that being the way he is is ok. It all stems for being abandoned at birth and being unpopular and bullied at school etc. So it eats away at them and because their life isnt how they wanted it to be or like a normal persons they have to make up the life they want it to be. They live in a make believe world surrounded by people that dont exist and pretend to be loved when they are sad lonely and full of jealously. They also claim they know famous people again to make them feel important and popular because again they are alone and that way they think people will pay more attention to them. The famous people he has met have found him to be very creepy and unnerving and really couldnt wait to get away from him.. that I do know for sure. Their lives thrive on hatred, jealously and lies. He actually convinces himself that the things he says are true and it doesnt matter what you say to him he will try to convince you he is the person he says he is and will argue even though its blatantly obvious that he is lying. He has Pseudologia Fantastica (see below). He really doesnt feel that he is doing anything wrong and he really believes that he is liked and respected. To be a good liar you have to have an excellent memory and Bret hasnt! Bret will say one thing and then say another and when questioned he then will say he never wrote that etc that it was someone else using his name. So you see Bret is an open book and his life and him are based on lies just like the trash he writes. Whatever happens to him it will be his own fault and hopefully his downfall. I wouldnt want to be a laughing stock like him! Thats probably one of the reasons why he doesnt go out as he has made such bad name for himself. He is frightened of his own shadow and a coward. He hates being ignored and loves to goad people so when they bite back he gets the chance to be as nasty and spiteful as he can. What a way to live full of hate and jealously such a sorry a pitiful way to be. Just shows how bitter and twisted he really is and mentally ill as well. 





Definition psyche David Bret



PSEUDOLOGIA FANTASTICA


The defining characteristics of pseudologia fantastica are that, first, the stories told are not entirely improbable and often have some element of truth. They are not a manifestation of delusion or some more intense type of psychosis: upon confrontation, the teller can admit them to be untrue, even if unwillingly. Second, the fabricative tendency is long lasting; it is not provoked by the immediate situation or social pressure as much as it is an innate trait of the personality.
Third, a definitely internal, not an external, motive for the behavior can be discerned clinically e.g. long lasting extortion or habitual spousal battery might cause a person to lie repeatedly, without the lying being a pathological symptom. Fourth, the stories told tend toward presenting the liar favorably. For example, the person might be presented as being fantastically brave, knowing or being related to many famous people.
Pseudologia fantastica may also present as false memory syndrome, where the sufferer genuinely believes that fictitious events have taken place, regardless that these events are fantasies. The sufferer may believe that he or she has committed superhuman acts of altruism and love or has committed equally grandiose acts of diabolical evil, for which the sufferer must atone, or has already atoned for in his/her fantasies.

PROD.10 Bret: My greatest desire: McCanns and Lazzeri have perished in a smash on the M1

Screenshots

PROD.11 Bret gives phonenumber to group to stalk the SUN

Facebook


Discussion on Facebook. About the Sun.
David Bret gives Sun sub-editor phonenumber to troll the sun.


Que Cherrett Phone the Sun and tell them they have fucked up. I just did.
Yesterday at 14:31 · Like · 3 people
Suzanne Winter What did they say Que?
Yesterday at 14:35 · Like
Que Cherrett Bloke wanted to see Lazzywhatsits emails, and he said he couldn't see Davids blog, I told him they had screwed up right royal and libelled him, and that hate blogs set up as a result of her contacts with these people had been set up and reported to CEOP already. Told him to contact David or get an editor to do it!
Yesterday at 14:38 · Like · 4 people
Rachel Louise George thank you que, i just want pic of my children off there, did he seem to take it seriously? x
Yesterday at 14:39 · Like
Que Cherrett He didn't seem to understand...he hadn't read the story even!! But hey ring the news desk and complain that this is a result of her trolling activities and you have been to the Police.
Yesterday at 14:41 · Like
Que Cherrett They certainly wouldn't use that picture!
Yesterday at 14:41 · Like
Rachel Louise George could you send me the number? x
Yesterday at 14:42 · Like
Carly Michelle Dunham if this helps this is the contact number for google/blogger
Yesterday at 14:43 · Like
Carly Michelle Dunham its a us number
Yesterday at 14:43 · Like
Carly Michelle Dunham but its alli could find
Yesterday at 14:43 · Like
Que Cherrett ‎020 7782 4100 London office or you can try same with 4000. Ask to speak to an editor Lazzarelli has obviously been in contact with some odious people, who probably trolled her!
Yesterday at 14:44 · Like
Que Cherrett Don't get into any conversations that can be twisted against you, just point out that the Sun has been taken in, and that you have been to Police and CEOP and this could be bad for the Sun!
Yesterday at 14:47 · Like
David Bret I hope you're not asking me to give you the number of the Sun's sub-editor, because there's NO way I'm going to tell you that it's 020 7782 4000....but I am going to tell you to be careful what you say, polite (even though they are not) and non-confrontational. Just don't drop us (and me) in it any further!

PROD..12 The Sun libels David Bret Twitter/Facebook

DrGaspar2007 @arusbridger That's Nothing #Sun journo Lazzarelli threatens David Bret with harassment when he asks why she lied about what he said!

Que Cherrett This what we want! The word out there about their bullshit! Fight the fuckers I say.

Debbie Carden Wray Where are they getting the information though Que, because David hasn't said he has posted it elsewhere has he??
Or are we thinking that this reporter is spreading it about??

Que Cherrett Doubt the reporter is spreading it! But I think people should deffo tell tweety world what the Sun is up to.

Claire 'bear' Smith Good point Debbie, how do they know?

Claire 'bear' Smith If that's the case Que, she knows those kinda ppl?

Que Cherrett It certainly isn't favourable to her, perhaps Davids friends are getting the word out there for him, its not just us in this room that are outraged.
Pat Brown told me she couldn't believe the stupidity of this, she may be quiet but she is not subdued!

Claire 'bear' Smith I havent been on twitter yet today to see for myself but Kerryn, I'm wondering too

Suzanne Winter Who is this twitterer? DrGaspar2007 @MikeHitchen
The Sun libels David Bret, Sun journo in email showing contacts to filth TROLLERS since reported to Police and CEOP.
DrGaspar2007 Gaspar
@
@top_antivirus Murdoch Sun libels blogger David Bret, links between SUN and #McCann campaign to silence to be exposed.

David Bret There is no mole here. Before this group was made secret, she was able to see some of our comments on newsfeed, but the worst mistake we made,
some of us, was commenting on the Sun's FB page. They did this to catch us out.
David Bret They've been collecting comments for weeks from elsewhere, long before "trollgate"

Lynne Susan Riley I think they have been trying to set us up, with the fund running low they need money from somewhere

David Bret I've already got my Antonella speech prepared is she attacks me tomorrow.


**Note that Bret sidesteps the question of how DrGaspar2007 would know that the journo supposedly misquoted him.
Meanwhile Spudgun tweets a suggestion she has been taped. It all stinks of him, doesn't it?

PROD 13: The Sun Journalist and the sighting in India

http://mccannnotaccusingjustasking.blogspot.com/2011/09/sun-journalist-sighting-in-india.html


The Sun Journalist & The Sighting In India



Last Thursday evening I received an email from Antonella Lazzeri of The Sun newspaper, asking me to contact her: in her email she specified comments I had made which were anti-McCann, the e-petition, and a picture I had posted on my website some time ago (since deleted) of a little girl smoking.
I needn't have contacted Ms Lazzeri, but my previous experience with tabloid journalists has taught me that if you don't play their game, they don't always respond fairly.
Ms Lazzeri called me, and it was like being interrogated by the Gestapo. Firstly she tore a strip off me about the picture, which I had acquired from a website which also contained a picture of Madeleine wearing full make-up. My first impression was, what kind of parents allow this to happen to a three-year-old girl. Then I was made aware that it was not Madeleine, and I removed it, adding an apology.
Secondly, Ms Lazzeri criticised my petition, which she claimed was wrong. There had been a sighting in India, she said. I cannot remember whether this was covered by The Sun, but as the above link shows, the Leh Police deny the event. Therefore I stick by my own opinion, of which absolutely no one may argue. One party says that the sighting took place, the other that it did not. One of them is not telling the truth, and I am not saying which one because I do not know.
Next, Ms Lazzeri criticised my own criticism of the Find Madeleine Fund. The McCanns, she said, were using the money donated to the Fund, even though an expensive police review is taking place.
Regarding the "If I Get 1 Million Likes" Facebook page, Ms Lazzeri told me that this was none of my business. I beg to differ. The Sun boasts that they had this page shut down. In fact, I reported the matter to the CEOP (case ref: 22482 RA), after the Official Find Madeleine people threatened to take action against me for reporting on this blog that their address and telephone number were linked to the page. Obviously, whoever created the page was responsible for this--yet The Sun appeared to know nothing about this link until I sent them a screenshot, which they conveniently published in their "trolling" article on Saturday.
This article, penned by Brian Flynn and Gary O'Shea, managed to get their facts very wrong about me. To call me a "blogger" is pretty much like me calling them articulate journalists. The piece contained all the usual tabloid trademark phrases: sick, vile, disgusting, shameless, etc. I'm very surprised they didn't manage to squeeze the feature about Gary Glitter on the same page. Neither have I "targeted the McCanns with posts wrongly accusing them of being involved in Maddie's abduction." First of all, you cannot wrongly accuse someone of something when no one knows what actually happened. Secondly, I never accused the McCanns of such a crime--it was one of their supporters, Chicane of JATYK2, who accused ME. And yes, I do have a contact at Scotland Yard. The Sun knows about this, as do the CEOP and Associated Press.
On Saturday, after reading this erroneous statement, I wrote to Ms Lazzeri, whose response was: should I print anything about her that is libellous, she will instruct the paper's lawyers to deal with it, also anything which she constitutes as harassment.
I have no intention of doing so (my Morrissey-style reference to some kind of Jayne Mansfield motorway scenario being not a libelous statement, but a heartfelt wish). I do find it rather hypocritical, though, that in the past Ms Lazzeri has not always been supportive of the McCanns (see Spudgun's Spoutings and other sources)--also, that newspapers such as The Sun do not always behave in what I would call a gentlemanly manner while acquiring their scoops. Mike Tindall being the latest example. Also, I fail to comprehend why, with this current trend of "exposing trolls", The Sun names and shames only the trolls, yet ignores the even more vicious attacks on anyone who dares to question the McCann case--these people post personal details on their forums, and even death-threats, but their actions are promptly ignored. Why?
When you consider how many of our celebrities' lives have been trashed and ruined by their intrusive methods of investigation (and here I am NOT referring to Ms Lazzeri), some of the so-called red-tops do not have a very nice reputation. The News of the World was zapped, and it would be nice to see The Sun taking the same highway. Also, what I found profoundly alarming was the tabloid journalist who told me, when I asked what would happen should the McCanns ever be arrested (again, I am NOT accusing): "We simply would not publish the story."
It makes me wonder what kind of a society we are living in.